Hippokratia 2017, 21(3):159
Sapountzi Z, Vital V, Psillas G
1st Otolaryngology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle’s University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki , Greece
Key words: Benign positional paroxysmal vertigo, BPPV, subjective visual vertical
Corresponding author: Sapountzi Z, 1st Otolaryngology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle’s University of Thessaloniki, e-mail: email@example.com
The site of peripheral vestibular lesion determined by the subjective visual vertical of gravity (SVV) in patients with benign positional paroxysmal vertigo (BPPV) is not well specified. According to some authors1-3, no correlation between the side of the lesion and the perceived tilt in BPPV was found; in other studies, SVV tilt occurred in BPPV in the affected side, but in some BPPV patients this happened towards the unaffected one4,5, or is normal5,6.
In the study we conducted, we found that in all 40 enrolled patients diagnosed with BPPV, the SVV was abnormally increased to the affected side within 72 hours from the symptoms onset; the mean SVV was 5.75ο (1.11) and this was statistically significant (p <0.001) compared to the mean SVV of the control group (0ο ± 2ο). To determine SVV, the bucket method was used. Immediately after therapeutic maneuvers, SVV in all patients demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in comparison to the time of diagnosis but still remained in abnormal values. In the follow-up one week later, all patients finally normalized their SVV. Thus, according to presented results, SVV can safely assume the affected labyrinth at the time of diagnosis showing the deviation towards the dysfunctional site.
The pathophysiologic basis of SVV deviation to the affected side is not well understood. SVV depends on the otolithic organs with somatosensory and visual signals. One could presume that in BPPV the more the otoconia mass detaches from the utricle and enters the semicircular canals the more intense the BPPV clinical symptoms present. A greater absence of otoconia mass in the otolithic membrane generates minor stimulation in the crista receptors and greater SVV deviation to the affected side. SVV reduction after maneuvers is due to return of the debris to the utricle.
The need for a rehabilitation period for SVV reinstatement in normal range suggests that particles progressively attach in order to fully incorporate in the whole mass of otoconia in the otolithic membrane. Finally, restoration of otoconia into otolithic organs normalizes SVV.
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
1. Boleas-Aguirre FM, Sánchez-Ferrándiz N, Perez N. The subjective visual vertical in benign paroxysmal positional ver-tigo. A preliminary study. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord), 2005; 126: 253-255.
2. Böhmer A, Rikenmann J. The subjective visual vertical as a clinical parameter of vestibular function in vestibular dis-eases. J Vestib Res. 1995; 5: 35-45.
3. Faralli M, Manzari L, Panichi R, Botti F, Ricci G, Longari F, et al. Subjective visual vertical before and after treatment of a BPPV episode. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011; 38: 307-311.
4. Chetana N, Jayesh R. Subjective Visual Vertical in Various Vestibular Disorders by Using a Simple Bucket Test. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 67: 180-184.
5. Ferreira MM, Gananca MM, Ganança CF, Ganança MM, Caovilla HH. Subjective visual vertical with the bucket method in Brazilian healthy individuals. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 82: 442-446.
6. Cohen HS, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. Subjective visual vertical in vestibular disorders measured with the bucket test. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012; 132: 850-854.